top of page
Search

Everything I’ve Learned About the CeMAP Changes in 2026 (So Far)

If you’ve been anywhere near CeMAP over the past year, you’ll already know that things haven’t exactly stood still. There’s been a steady stream of changes that have left a lot of people feeling unsure about where they stand. I’ve had countless messages from students asking whether they’re sitting the “right” version of the exam, whether the content has changed dramatically, or whether they need to completely rethink how they’re studying.


Now, after all the changes have settled, what I've realised is CeMAP hasn’t suddenly become unrecognis

able, but the way it’s being assessed has shifted just enough to catch people out. And when you’re already juggling work and family life, that uncertainty can feel heavier than it needs to be. So I wanted to put everything I’ve learned so far into one place. This is based on conversations with LIBF, feedback from my own students, and what I’m seeing play out in real time.



What has actually changed?

One of the biggest misconceptions I’m seeing is people assuming that the qualification itself has become significantly harder. In reality, the core content is still very similar. What has changed is how that knowledge is being tested, and that’s where people are feeling the difference.


CeMAP 1 has now been rebranded as FSRE, which stands for Financial Services, Regulation and Ethics. While the topics themselves haven’t dramatically shifted, the structure (and complexity) of the exam has. But it is still 2 x multiple choice question units, now though you can sit these units separately instead of as one, long two hour exam.


Previously, a lot of students could get through by recognising patterns, memorising key facts, and repeating mock questions until things stuck. That approach alone doesn’t hold up as well anymore. The exam now leans more heavily on your ability to interpret information and apply your knowledge in context, which requires a slightly deeper level of understanding.


The impact of case study questions

If there’s one change that has had the biggest impact across the new CeMAP 1 (FSRE), it’s the increased use of case study questions. This is where I see the most common mistakes happening, especially for students who are used to more traditional multiple-choice formats.


A lot of people instinctively read the full case study first, trying to absorb every detail before even looking at the question. In practice, this often wastes time and creates unnecessary pressure. What I teach my students instead is to read the question first, understand what’s actually being asked, and then decide whether the case study needs to be referenced at all. In many situations, the question can be answered without going back to the case in full.


This small shift in approach can make a huge difference, particularly in timed conditions where confidence and pacing matter just as much as knowledge. I


Changes to CeMAP 2 and CeMAP 3

CeMAP 2 has been simplified structurally, which on the surface sounds like a positive change, but it still requires a solid understanding of the material. It is now split into two units rather than the previous structure of four, but the expectation around knowledge hasn’t dropped. You still need to understand mortgage products in detail and be able to apply that understanding in different scenarios.


CeMAP 3, is exactly the same, it's still entirely case study-based, with 60 questions built around six different case studies. Each case study presents a client scenario, and you are expected to work through multiple questions linked to that situation.


What often surprises students is the relatively low number of calculation-based questions. While calculations haven’t disappeared completely, instead, there is a much stronger emphasis on protection and the suitability of advice, which reflects more closely what you would be doing in a real advisory role.


Understanding the pass mark properly

Across all CeMAP exams, the pass mark remains at 70 percent. On paper, that can feel reassuring, but it’s important to understand what that actually looks like in practice. The style of questioning, particularly with case studies, means that achieving 70 percent in the real exam requires a higher level of consistency in your preparation.


This is why I always encourage my students to aim for at least 85%+ percent in mock exams before booking their test. That buffer gives you room for the unpredictability that can come with exam conditions, whether that’s nerves, slightly unfamiliar wording, or simply having an off day. It’s not about perfection, it’s about putting yourself in a position where a pass feels controlled rather than hopeful.


The reality of the new exam platform

The move to online exams has been another significant change, and it was something I was completely not sold on at the time. But the new AI Invigilated exam software has been a welcome change with almost no students reporting problems after it's initial launch in January.


Who is sitting which version?

One of the areas that caused the most confusion during the transition was understanding which version of the exam each student should be sitting. The general rule is that anyone who registered after 30 September 2025 will be on the new format for CeMAP 1 (so you sit FSRE). And anyone who registered before that September date has until July to pass the 'old' CeMAP 1 exam. Everyone is now on the 'new' CeMAP 2&3 format.


There have been some situations where students needed to contact LIBF directly to clarify or switch their exam format, so if there is any uncertainty, it’s always worth checking your portal or speaking to them directly. It’s far better to confirm early than to second guess yourself later on.


The biggest mistake I’m seeing this year

Interestingly, one of the most common issues I’m seeing in 2026 isn’t under-preparation, it’s over-preparation. Because the exams feel new and slightly unfamiliar, many students respond by trying to learn everything in as much detail as possible. While that might sound like a safe approach, it often leads to overwhelm and burnout.


The students who are progressing the fastest are the ones who keep their approach simple and focused. They follow a clear plan, whether that's solo or a guided route with me, then prioritise exam technique, and use mock exams strategically rather than endlessly. They understand that there is a difference between knowing the content and knowing how to pass the exam, and they make space for both.


What hasn’t changed

Despite all of these updates, the foundation of CeMAP remains the same. You are still being assessed on your understanding of financial regulation, your knowledge of mortgage products, and your ability to apply that knowledge in realistic client scenarios.


That consistency is important, because it means that even if the format feels different, the underlying principles you are learning still carry through. When things start to feel overwhelming, bringing your focus back to those fundamentals can help steady everything again.


My honest opinion on the changes

From what I’ve seen so far, these changes are actually a positive step forward. They make the qualification feel more aligned with real-world advice, and they encourage a deeper level of understanding rather than surface-level memorisation.


That said, they do require a slightly different approach to studying, and that’s where many people are currently struggling. It’s not about working harder, it’s about working in a way that reflects how the exams are now structured. I will say this... FSRE is a level 4 qualification. It IS harder that CeMAP 1 was, and that's something worth being aware of.


If you’re starting CeMAP in 2026

If you’re just beginning your journey, or even if you’ve been at this for a while and feel like things aren’t quite clicking, the key is to keep your approach grounded and structured. Focus on understanding the content rather than just getting through it, build confidence with case study questions early on, and use mock exams as a tool to guide your progress rather than something you only do at the end.


Most importantly, don’t feel like you have to figure everything out on your own. The difference between feeling stuck and moving forward often comes down to having the right support and direction at the right time.


Free CeMAP Training

The first 3 months of this year has been a whirlwind for me too. I have rebuilt my ENTIRE learning content, not just to update for the 2026 changes, but to incorpirate absolutely everything I have learned in the last 4 years of doing this, and i'm proud to say it is absolutely my best work (you can check it out here for free)


Due to incredible demand, I have brought the fast track courses back for the rest of 2026, as well as my Monthly Free CeMAP Training Sessions for any and all to join. You can catch up on my first one of 2026 HERE or get on the list for the next one HERE


 
 
 

Comments


© Futures in Finance by Charlotte Hemmingway. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page